Listen Live

Wed & Fri
10pm EST 7pm PST


Read the Bills Act Coalition


LiveFreeRadio on Twitter





Email Alerts

All subscribe/unsubscribe requests must be confirmed via email.


Contact
We Are on Twitter
We Are on MySpace
Advertise On the Show

Get Informed
The Bill of Rights

Please Support Our Sponsors

  Live Free Patriot Wear
   Live Free Patriot Clothing

  Enter BuyDirectUSA Store
   Shop Today

  Tough Traveler
   Tough Traveler

The Constitution Party of North Carolina

We Are The New Main Stream Media. We the People will Spread the Truth Since the Corporate Media will not do its job.

Search

May 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

XML Feeds

Search

Poll

Do You Support Obamacare?

View Results

Google Ads

Contents

powered by b2evolution free blog software

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Tags: anti christain

02/07/09

Permalink 11:21:17 am, by live free radio jp Email , 232 words, 368 views   English (US)
Categories: News, Take Action, Christian Information

Anti-faith language remains in stimulus package

Link: http://www.livefreeradio.net/index.php/anti-faith-language-remains-in-stimulus-

Anti-faith language remains in stimulus package
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 2/7/2009 4:15:00

The U.S. Senate has taken action that could mean a legal battle royal over the stimulus bill.

The Senate rejected an amendment offered by Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) that would have stripped language from the stimulus bill that would force colleges and universities to throw religious clubs off campus if the schools receive federal funds. (See earlier article)

Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law & Justice had this reaction.

"Well, not only is it disappointing, it's almost a throwback to litigation that we conducted in the 1980s that we won unanimously at the Supreme Court," he says. "And I feel like this particular legislation pokes the finger in the eye of people who take religious faith seriously.

Jay Sekulow (Amer. Ctr. for Law & Policy)"It's discriminatory in its application, unconstitutional as it's written, [and] unfortunately it's going to take four or five years for it to be litigated all the way through," Sekulow adds.

With passage of the bill with the restrictions in place, how might colleges and universities be affected? "We're going to look at filing an application for a stay of this provision, trying to get it declared unconstitutional through a restraining order," he shares.

Sekulow plans to file suit the day after President Obama signs the bill

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=411848