Listen Live
10pm EST 7pm PST
Email Alerts
Contact
We Are on Twitter
We Are on MySpace
Advertise On the Show
Get Informed
The Bill of Rights
Please Support Our Sponsors
Live Free Patriot Clothing
Shop Today
| « Keep Up the Pressure to Kill a Dangerous Bill | Threat to Free Speech Lights a Fire in the Grassroots » |
Defeat the DISCLOSE Act
06/22/10
Categories: News, Real ID, Economy, Elections, Take Action, laws, BuyAmerican, Illegal Immigration, Politics, Police State, Globalism, Climate Change / Global Warming, Technology, Military, Socialism, Health
Defeat the DISCLOSE Act
Quote of the Day: "As we noted in our amicus brief supporting Citizens United, the FEC now has regulations for 33 types of contributions and speech, and 71 different types of speakers. Regardless of the abstract merit of the various arguments for and against limits on political contributions and spending, this very complexity raises serious concerns about whether the law can be enforced consistent with the First Amendment." -- 8 former Commissioners of the Federal Election Commission, writing in the Wall Street Journal, May 19, 2010
The word "disclose," as used in the title of the DISCLOSE Act, is a silly acronym that stands for "Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections."
We couldn't disagree more.
The provisions of this bill (H.R. 5175 and S. 3295) would actually...
* Protect incumbents from competition by other candidates, and from criticism by citizens' groups.
* Violate your First Amendment rights to free speech, free press, and assembly.
* Harm your First Amendment right to petition Congress for a redress of grievances.
* Crush your Ninth Amendment right to associate with others for peaceful purposes, such as defeating incumbent office holders and electing new representatives.
It's important to understand that . . .
* Incumbent politicians support campaign finance laws, like the DISCLOSE Act, because these laws kill your ability to fire and replace them.
* Media companies also love these laws because they cripple your ability to be your own media, by joining with others to fund political advertising campaigns.
Unlike you, and the political organizations you support, media companies enjoy completely unrestricted freedoms of speech, press, and association. They can raise and spend unlimited amounts . . .
* to tell you what you should believe,
* and which candidates are worth considering,
* while completely ignoring or ridiculing those candidates who don't support the Establishment Ideology of Crony Capitalism and Welfare-Warfare Statism.
Specifically, in this case, the DISCLOSE Act would harm DownsizeDC.org, Inc, and other organizations like it. This harm would come in many ways, including the following . . .
If we spend more than $10,000 on political communications during a calendar year we would have to report to the government, and to the general public, ALL donors who have given between $600 or $1,000, depending on the type of political communications we wanted to express.
This may sound trivial, but it's actually ominous . . .
* Instead of simply exercising our rights to free expression we would have to start thinking about whether or not something we wanted to say would trigger the requirements of this law.
* We would also have to start spending money that our donors gave for one purpose, such as educating the public, to comply with this law.
* These reporting requirements will also have a chilling effect on donations. Those who fear potential retaliation from Congress, or who simply value their privacy, may decide to cease making donations.
And that's exactly what the DISCLOSE proponents want -- they want to reduce political expression by groups that represent your anti-Statist ideals. They want to silence DC Downsizers and other groups that oppose the imposition of new burdens on the American people.
This danger is especially severe with larger donors who may have business interests that could be harmed by incumbent politicians. Business leaders know that politicians routinely use their power to reward friends and punish enemies. That's why the DISCLOSE Act also requires that . . .
Both the head of an organization, AND the top contributor to any broadcast ad, must both include recorded statements that they approve the message. Television ads and political mailings, must also list the top five contributors to the organization.
* Once again, this will have a chilling effect on contributions, and once again, this is what incumbent politicians want, because it will reduce the amount of criticism and competition directed at them.
* This requirement will also create administrative headaches. Fundraising materials will have to contain disclosure requirements, and database software will have to be re-programmed to account for these requirements.
* The cost of making ads will also increase, because top donors will have to travel to record their endorsements.
* The broadcast time required to say "this message was funded by... and I approve this message" will also eat into the educational portion of every ad.
In many 30-second ads, DISCLOSE would require no fewer than six statements as to who is paying for the ad (the current law already requires one such statement). These disclaimers would take up as much as half of every ad.
The DISCLOSE Act will also prohibit communications that could be interpreted as advocating a candidate's election or defeat, even if the communication doesn't specifically use those words. This is potentially the most dangerous provision of this legislation given that it is COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE.
No one will be able to know for sure if they are violating this law when they prepare an ad or other communication, so it will be safer to simply remain silent. Or, they could choose to divert even more of their donor's money hiring lawyers before making each and every move.
We urge you to spread the word about this important issue. Forward this to friends and share on Facebook.
Thank you for being a DC Downsizer!
Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.
IN THE NEWS
OBAMA NATION
Spectacularly unprepared
http://bit.ly/djB0Wz
POLITICS & GOVERNMENT
Perdue leads S. American trade mission
http://bit.ly/9nFwKe
Puerto Ricans need new birth certificates after July 1st
http://bit.ly/byd9zq
Rahm Emanuel expected to quit White House
http://bit.ly/ckmSK0
Report: U.S., Israeli warships cross Suez Canal toward Red Sea
http://bit.ly/9xlw2X
Armada of U.S. and Israeli Warships Head for Iran
http://bit.ly/cR15Ef
Juan Manuel Santos wins Colombia presidential election
http://bit.ly/bN3S4H
POLICE STATE NEWS
Is Israel becoming a police state?
http://bit.ly/9zpct8
Police State New York
http://bit.ly/aXZQyV
ECONOMIC NEWS
Economy Weak, Data Look Even Weaker
http://yhoo.it/bUNV95
Senate fails to spare doctors from Medicare cuts
http://yhoo.it/akhdld
Rethinking Part of the American Dream
http://bit.ly/beU9Ip
REAL ID & PRIVACY NEWS
Cold-plate folly Untraceable License Plates for the Privileged
http://bit.ly/cjdSSj
Washington state DMV workers accused of selling licenses
http://bit.ly/bCL9aQ
What Is Your Facebook Data Worth?
http://bit.ly/acXeit
ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS
Guess who holds patent for carbon-trading plan
http://bit.ly/bs5Rg7
OIL SPILL 2010
Gulf Workers SICK AS DOGS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65ek2EfWNEU&feature=related
Gulf Oil Spill-Gutsy Solution Restores Environment in Just Six Weeks
http://bit.ly/bEaoZe
HEALTH NEWS
Cartoon Characters Sell Kids on Unhealthy Foods
http://bit.ly/cmj2so
Firms paid to shut down wind farms when the wind is blowing
http://bit.ly/df8LTu
Sunscreen scam: We spend millions on protection, so why is skin cancer still on the rise?
http://bit.ly/a4UURp
Record Number Of Britons Living With Cancer
http://bit.ly/ciuo4q
US Supreme Court lifts ban on sale of GM crop
http://yhoo.it/czwjss
ER doctors: Lawsuit fears lead to overtesting
http://bit.ly/a8NDeW
FDA Fines Red Cross $16 Million For Blood-Safety-Law Failures - Is it safe to donate?
http://bit.ly/aVme3G
California school launches cell tower study
http://bit.ly/bIxY21
PUBLIC EDUCATION
How public education cripples our kids, and why
http://bit.ly/HNWJF
CHRISTIANITY NEWS
Church that made 'Fireproof' making new film on fatherhood
http://bit.ly/94Mbv4
Idaho school battle over Bible ongoing
http://bit.ly/bjMpNS
Guns in church bill headed to governor
http://bit.ly/bvTws1
Christian evangelists arrested at Arab festival
http://bit.ly/aMqmVw
ABORTION NEWS
Boehner calling Obama's bluff on abortion
http://bit.ly/bInDHT
Proof: Tax dollars going to abortions
http://bit.ly/abfK7U
IMMIGRATION NEWS
Neb. town to vote on illegal immigration measure
http://bit.ly/bYjQU5
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mobile phones new turf for hackers
http://bit.ly/bdoOoa
Hackers Battle Censors in Turkey
http://bit.ly/cThhiW
1 comment
Disclose Act Will Choke First Amendment
The Neomarxist behind the Obama/FTC intend to drown out the voice of America with Obama/Marxist propaganda, enforcing new regulations that will cripple bloggers and other alternative media from disseminating information, free speech that grass-roots among other organizations depend on to make informed decisions. Obama’s support of the DISCLOSE Act confirmed what many Americans already believed; that Obama and certain Democrats in Congress intend to strangle the flow of information. If Obama and his leftists associations get their way, our Children will be brainwashed by Obama’s one-sided propaganda at school, through Obama controlled Radio, TV and Obama media policies that restrict the free flow of information. Historically when communists attempted or took over a country, one of their first steps was to control the media and all forms of public communications to control Civilian populations. When Russia took over Hungary, it immediately took control of the Radio stations to thwart Citizen resistance and to psychologically control the People. Considering the Obama administration’s obsession with controlling all media, one might ask, are some of the same persons inside and outside U.S. Government working with the Obama administration to push the Disclose Act and other censorship regulations, involved in causes that promulgate overthrow of the United States? While some in the Obama Government say they support dismantling capitalism, brick by brick, does their endgame call for destruction of the United States? If it does, what should Americans do to stop it? Does the Obama administration’s proposed censorship of free speech e.g., the Disclose Act threaten National Security? In other countries where members of political parties and ideological extremists attempted or succeeded in this kind of forced censorship, forbidding Citizens to receive information, they have been arrested for treason among other crimes. The Obama administration appears intended to curtail Americans’ right to know, restrict American’s right to communicate via the Internet and the Obama administration admits they want to pay writers in newspapers and other media to covertly propagandize their point of view. Is this not treason? Top CZAR Cass Sunstein prepared a 2008 paper that proposed spying on Americans, infiltrating groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government.
See: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884
The majority of Americans oppose military governments. But increasingly during the last six months, more Americans quietly state they would trust the U.S. Military running U.S. Government temporarily over extremists in Obam’s government; that they would support a quasi Civilian/military form of government temporarily provided their civil and constitutional rights were protected and importantly, all leftists extremists in U.S. Government were deposed. This recent change of attitude by Americans might be explained by the fact they can relate to their U.S. Military and find nothing in common with Obama and his extreme leftist associations and supporters. Increasingly Americans appear to fear the Obama government more than the idea of having the U.S. Military temporarily run U.S. Government. Additionally Obama’s refusal to secure America’s Mexican border might have contributed to Americans identifying with a quasi/U.S. military government over an Obama government that won’t protect Border States from foreign invaders. The number of Marxists in the U.S. is small, but having them control any part of our government is repugnant to most Americans that believe it not in the best interest of our economy, national defense and National Security. Considering the direction America is going economically, more Americans are afraid that if things collapse, Obama might use the U.S. Military against U.S. Citizens; that should things collapse a quasi Civilian/U.S. Military government not the Obama administration should run America. This is mentioned only to note there is a strong wind blowing across America, that is howling enough Obama.